home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Encounters: The UFO Phenomenon, Exposed!
/
Encounters - The UFO Phenomenon, Exposed (1995).iso
/
abduct
/
abduc113.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-07-25
|
6KB
|
130 lines
Abduction Digest, Number 82
Monday, December 28th 1992
(C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service. All Rights Reserved.
Today's Topics:
Delaware talk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John.Powell@f601.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Powell)
Subject: Delaware talk
Date: 22 Dec 92 11:17:02 GMT
-=> Quoting David Jacobs to John Powell <=-
DJ> John, I will be glad to talk with you about the Linda
DJ> case tothe best of my ability if I have the time after the
DJ> Delaware MUFON talk. See you there.
You didn't, I wasn't; sometimes it happens that way... <grin>
It really isn't the Linda case that I was interested in though. On
another net we've been discussing/brainstorming/wish-listing what it
would take to bring Abduction out of the closet (so to speak). During
that process we more or less settled on two important items. The first
was that it is breaking out of the closet sort of on its own, in more
ways than one, partly due to media popularity and certainly in part due
to the work of you and others (Hopkins, etc.) coupled with the data
implied by the Roper poll.
With that first item tending to dominate the forefront of the thinking
we then realized that there might very well be well-intentioned and
well-meaning folks out there somewhere who might try to use hard science
in their endeavors... And they might try to do that more or less on
their own.
So, we have pretty much decided on developing a reference/source
document, a standalone document, that could be used by virtually any
literate professional wishing to push the envelope regarding the
hard-data side of the issue.
Our document will look something (only slightly) like this:
Introduction
Abduction History/Anthology
The Abduction Surveillance Project
...
Project Team Selection...
Data Acquisition Methods...
Data Acquisition Equipment...
Data Acquisition Equipment Sources...
...
Please note I _am not_ requesting a journalistic response from you
regarding general content or organization of the formal document nor am
I requesting overview comments. (However, please feel free to provide
them if you think they will contribute to the objectives as stated.)
Let me couch my request as follows: On the one hand we have folks,
abductees or otherwise (yourself included) who are within a hair certain
that alien beings from some other place are arriving here in spaceships
and they are abducting humans for the purpose of some sort of genetic
experimentation. (And this may very well be exactly what is
happenning.) On the other hand we have that Toastmaster of Titilation,
the Philster Himself, the Klassmiester, who wouldn't acknowledge an
implant if he passed one. Somewhere inbetween, and much closer to the
other hand, are about 99% of the scientific community and about 90% of
the general population. How do we change that?
We think we change that situation by wiring an Abductee, and their
living quarters, with just about every piece of gear we can get. We are
assuming that we have unlimited funding, the so-called Grand Design, and
then we plan to incrementally reduce the scope of the project to the
point just prior to which the data acquired is worthless. We plan to
document each version of the Design, (including specific equipment
requirements, sources of acquisition by geographic location,
installation instructions, etc.), so that (as anticipated) someone out
there can pick this source document off the shelf and actually begin the
process of discrete scientific monitoring with some hope of credibility.
Here are my specific requests of you:
1 - We have decided and affirmed that the Project Team should be
headed by a professional psychiatrist who will directly and
exclusively interface with the Abductee. Do you agree with this
decision Yes/No, and why?
2 - We have decided and affirmed that a pre-teen Abductee,
(strictly within the scope of #1 above), is the best possible
choice as the Subject of the Project. Do you agree with this
decision Yes/No, and why?
3 - What is _the_ most important bit of hard data that you would
like to have? (Videotape, photograph, radar, anomolous magnetic
field in bedroom, anomolous microwave field in bedroon,
physically attached transponder on Abductee registering high
altitude...???)
I thank you in advance for wading through this. We might be completely
off target (I don't think we are) but I think there could very well be a
bunch of folks (in the making) who are competent enough to want to do
something but who just need a reference document to point the way...
Thanks, take care.
John.
-
<Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence>
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.10
--
John Powell - via ParaNet node 1:104/422
UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name
INTERNET: John.Powell@f601.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG
*******************************************************************************
Submissions abduct@scicom.alphacdc.com
Administrative requests abduct-request@scicom.alphacdc.com
FTP archive grind.isca.uiowa.edu:/info/paranet/abduct
Permission to distribute Michael.Corbin@paranet.org
Private mail to Paranet/Fidonet users firstname.lastname@paranet.org
UUCP gateway {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom
********************End**of**the**Abduction**Newsletter************************